Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Quinn Gleason vs Jodie Anna Burrage Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gleason vs Burrage analysis and find out who is favored!
Quinn Gleason vs Jodie Anna Burrage Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gleason 1 - 1 Burrage
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gleason has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Burrage has won 43.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gleason, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Burrage has won 58.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gleason has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burrage has saved 58.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gleason has won 25% of matches played (W/L 2/ 6), with Burrage winning 48.72% (W/L 19/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Burrage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 54/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Burrage has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gleason winning 1 times and Burrage being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gleason winning 2 and Burrage winning 3. The last match between Gleason and Burrage was at the Chicago Open - Chicago, 22-08-2023, First, Hard with Quinn Gleason getting the victory 5-7 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gleason and Burrage have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gleason winning 1 times and Burrage 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gleason winning 1, and Burrage 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gleason has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.88 while Burrage has played against players with an average rank of 230.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gleason has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burrage has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gleason has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burrage has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
883
Rank
323
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
138
Rank
85
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
55% (153-125)
Career Total W/L
59% (231-162)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$4,345
Career Prize Money
$330,361
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Quinn Gleason vs Jodie Anna Burrage For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gleason VS Burrage
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Quinn Gleason | Jodie Anna Burrage |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 28 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:41 | 2:15:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (117/178) | 53% (92/172) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (63/117) | 59% (54/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (29/61) | 49% (39/80) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 62% (13/21) | 58% (14/24) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (79/172) | 48% (86/178) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Quinn Gleason
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Quinn Gleason | Jodie Anna Burrage |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (105/102) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 45 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 121.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (389/623) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (267/389) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (101/234) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (33/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (288/684) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Quinn Gleason Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quinn Gleason
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Quinn Gleason
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Quinn Gleason
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Quinn Gleason
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Varvara Gracheva
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Emiliana Arango
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Astra Sharma
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gleason Vs Burrage Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gleason are available here and Burrage photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
